Skip to main content
European Commission logo
European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations

Combined Evaluation of DG ECHO’s humanitarian response to epidemics, and of DG ECHO’s partnership with the World Health Organization (2017-2021)

This combined, independent evaluation of DG ECHO’s epidemic response and WHO partnership found effective outbreak control but weak policy alignment and unclear strategy. It calls for stronger coordination and expanded tools.

  • Evaluation

Details

Publication date
1 December 2022
Author
Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO)
Countries
Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan, Syria

Description

This combined, independent evaluation focused on DG ECHO’s humanitarian response to epidemics and its strategic partnership with WHO between 2017-2021. The evaluation found that DG ECHO supported relevant and effective interventions that contributed to controlling disease outbreaks. Its strong field presence served as a platform to make appropriate funding decisions, and support humanitarian coordination and advocacy in epidemics. Initiatives to deploy civil protection assets in epidemic response show promise, but are currently underdeveloped. Specific policies on epidemics were lacking, and there were gaps between stated humanitarian policies and field-level practice. Major recommendations include bridging these gaps, fuller participation in relevant EU global health security initiatives, and expanding the specialist epidemics’ funding tool. The DG ECHO-WHO partnership lacked a clear documented vision, and DG ECHO lacked a nucleus of health policy experts to guide strategy. Instead the relationship was governed by ad-hoc High-level Strategic Dialogue meetings where mutual priorities were discussed but not filtered down to operational levels. Opportunities to work across the nexus exist, but these are hampered by the lack of a common vision to guide collaboration. Recommendations include developing a common framework for engagement; intensifying multi-level dialogues; and collaboration on strategic programming that leverages both partner’s respective strengths.

cover

Files

  • 1 FEBRUARY 2022
Main report
  • 1 DECEMBER 2022
Executive summary